Scope

Dancer in the Dark

Already eagerly anticipated as Lars Von Trier’s follow-up to the controversial Dogme project Idioterne (The Idiots, 1998), and as the acting debut of pop pixie and all-round Nineties icon Björk, Dancer in the Dark caused a storm at Cannes last year. Though the film won the Palme D’Or and Björk beat allcomers to win the best actress award, many film critics (led in Britain by Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian) expressed astonishment at the jury’s decisions. As reviews of the film’s general release further testify, the extraordinary polarity of opinions about Dancer in the Dark have focused upon a couple of central points : either that Von Trier has produced one of the most heart-rending celluloid experiences ever, or that he is a clinical master manipulator of audience emotions ; and that either Björk has managed a Method-like performance of astonishing intensity as Selma, the central protagonist, or that she is barely acting at all —that at best, it is Björk being über-Björk, a solipsistic star turn which barely acknowledges the rest of the cast. (One of the most notorious anecdotes doing the rounds in interviews and articles is that on one occasion, a tired and emotional Björk took a bite out of her costume ; Von Trier, while not present at this alleged scene, has not exactly denied the rumour, thereby giving credence to both Björk’s bjönkers image, and tales of the mutual antipathy between director and star.) Well, at the risk of resorting to cliché, this is a film and a central performance that each member of the general paying public—not just reviewers— will either love or hate. And at the risk of rendering this review redundant, it really is a film one has to see before taking sides. For even those who would usually dismiss the very idea of going to see a “musical” will have to admit that Von Trier has twisted the genre beyond any preconceptions (which for many younger viewers will be, at best, rainy Sunday afternoon snippets of The Sound of Music or Mary Poppins on the small screen). Whether one actually likes the film which emerges from Von Trier’s genre-bending is another matter.

Björk plays Selma, a Czech single mother who has emigrated to the United States in the 1950s to obtain the American medical expertise which will guarantee her young son’s future health—Selma fears he is about to be afflicted by the same hereditary eye problem which, as the film begins, she is starting to suffer from herself. Scrimping and saving wages from the grim manual labour she performs in a rural metalwork factory, Selma’s only modes of escapism are the Hollywood musicals she devours together with Cvalda, a fellow factory worker (Deneuve) and her role in a local production of well, of course—The Sound of Music. It is Selma’s infatuation with musicals which allows her to imaginatively recast the drudgery of factory work, with all its attendant mechanical clatterings, into a sepia-tinted musical stage set worthy of Fred’n’Ginger. Given that Von Trier has turned from the ostensibly “authentic” (actually playful) ten principles of the Dogme group to the musical, with all that genre’s high camp connotations, the move has met with understandable scepticism. Many of those who preconceive Dancer in the Dark as an exercise in pure style or postmodern pastiche will feel vindicated when Selma and other characters are seen discussing the musical genre even before the first song sequence comes along (surprisingly late in proceedings— about forty-five minutes in). Von Trier’s defenders will say that such self-referentiality negotiates the inherent “artificiality” of the musical genre. Yet that first musical sequence—in which Selma bursts into “I’ve Seen It All” at the moment that her adoring suitor (beautifully played by Peter Stormare) realises that the subject of his admiration is going blind—will surely make clear to all that Von Trier is not interested in making a merely nostalgic musical-by-numbers (in that sense Dancer in the Dark is a million miles away from Woody Allen’s execrable Everyone Says I Love You, 1996). Certainly, the fact that the musical sequences only take place in Selma’s mind, and that this somewhat abstracts the generic form from the narrative itself, may encourage detractors to argue that this merely proves Von Trier’s emotional disengagement. Yet this torque also allows Von Trier to emphasise the gap between Selma’s American Dream—as expressed in her love of Hollywood musicals, and her own mental-musical transformation of her rural-industrial environment into a Norman Rockwell landscape of singing and dancing suburban families—and the rather grimmer social reality. Indeed, the second song sequence, “Cvalda,” even more clearly emphasises the gap between the mundane labour the factory workers perform, and the metal machine music—“clatter, clash, clang,” Björk sings in onomatopoeic ecstasy—playing in Selma’s head. (Yet I suppose this oblique social critique, too, may be taken by some as evidence that the director, with his Danish hippie-commie upbringing and all that, does not sufficiently love the Hollywood musical to accede to its accompanying, all-American cultural assumptions. One also suspects that Von Trier is well aware that Selma’s fantasy of happy proles approximates Soviet art as much as it does the—dare one use the phrase nowadays ?—false consciousness of Hollywood musicals. Furthermore, the film strongly suggests that the terrifyingly casual anti-communism of the McCarthy era is one of the larger social forces that casts a grim shadow over our Eastern European heroine, pushing her that bit quicker towards her doom.) Perhaps most importantly of all, however, the musical sequences manage to be, if not exactly integral to the general narrative, emotionally effective perspectives upon Selma’s optimistic worldview.

To return to the plot : Selma has almost saved up enough hard cash for her son’s operation when—well, without giving too much away, fate (or rather, Selma’s increasing blindness and others’ desperation or lack of sympathy) conspires to separate working mother and hard-earned wages. Von Trier sends Selma on a desperate mission to recover the cash and, with it, her boy’s future. Suffice it to say that Selma’s quest merely takes her from bad to worse to an almost inevitable terminus on death row. Uncut’s Chris Roberts put it succintly : Selma’s “relentless bad luck makes Emily Watson’s in Von Trier’s ‘96 doom-fest Breaking the Waves seem like a stroll in the park.” Hence, those who were highly affected by that film will have their heart well and thoroughly wrenched by Dancer in the Dark ; those who balked at what seemed to be Von Trier’s purging of his Catholic guilt through Watson’s character will be appalled by Selma, another woman so selfless as to seem like a latter-day saint suffering for all our sins. (Such is the harrowing nature of Von Trier’s script that one can fully understand the rumours that, by also becoming Selma outside the studio in true Methodic fashion, Björk suffered intense emotional torture ; the actress herself has supposedly accused the director of “emotional pornography.”) The fact that Selma remains so determined and so selfless will seem implausible, even insulting to many viewers. Yet I never felt that Selma’s actions, her nigh-on saintly selflessness, ever came completely detached from her experiences and, especially, her sense of obligation to her son. It is also likely that certain facts which Selma keeps secret will infuriate many moviegoers, as her reluctance to tell the truth dooms her. However, I think that these secrets, too, can be traced back to Selma’s ultimate concern for her son’s future.

It is, to say the least, testament to Von Trier’s daring that Selma’s trip down death row is interrupted by the final, most outrageous musical sequence, jauntily titled “106 Steps” in reference to the number of strides taken on the walk itself. For some, the moment that the singing Selma pauses and lies down for a moment with another doomed denizen of death row will be the moment at which her saintliness is carried beyond any boundaries of taste. Yet I would suggest that already this sequence has been offset by the previous scene, in which Selma has desperately tried, but for once failed, to transform her reality into musical fantasy by conjuring an a-capella “My Favourite Things.” Similarly, the incongruous joie de vivre of “106 Steps” is compensated by the film’s final act ; at the risk of being facetious, I defy George W. Bush to watch that scene and then defend the death penalty on Oprah.

So, I liked Dancer in the Dark. A lot. But beyond that, I would not presume to speak for others. What I will say is that there is another sense in which you have to see this film : whether you love or loathe it, you will have to admit there is no-one—certainly no-one in Britain—taking the chances which Lars Von Trier takes in this film. Not even the Lars Von Trier who made the Lynch-ier than thou Riget (The Kingdom, 1994), the brilliant Breaking the Waves (1996) or the censor-baiting Idioterne (1998). Who else would cast the archetypal French ice maiden Deneuve as a working-class Czech immigrant spinster ? (This is, lest we forget, the man who cast Denmark’s premiere porn star in Idioterne.) Who else would cast a pop star in a film like this (OK, OK, there was Madonna in Evita but this isn’t Evita any more than it’s Chicken Run), and insist she also writes the music (Von Trier, of course, wrote the lyrics) in order to fully express Selma’s being ? Which brings me to my final point—this is one case where the maxim “see the film, buy the soundtrack” obtains. Not only does “Selmasongs” completely redefine our expectations of both traditional musical and modern tie-in soundtracks, it also ranks with Björk’s best work. Besides that voice, the production, by Björk and former LFO man Mark Bell, is a revelation. ‘I’ve Seen It All’ and ‘New World’ approximate the grand sweep of “Jóga” or “Play Dead” (the former features Radiohead’s Thom Yorke performing Stormare’s part ; as one wag has said, it’s the closest that the man behind “Kid A” has come to a melody in some time) ; “Cvalda” manages to marry the sound of musicals to techno beats’n’pieces which brilliantly approximate the industrial “rhythms” of the metalwork factory. Björk has said she’ll never make another film ; well, here’s hoping both she and Von Trier, in their respective fields of choice, can maintain the inspiration they found together—whatever their mooted mutual dislike—during the making of Dancer in the Dark.

publié dans Scope - 01.05.2001

 

Articles de la même année

 

2001

date
publication
titre
01.01.2001
One Guy’s Opinion
01.01.2001
Spin Magazine
01.01.2001
USA Today
02.02.2001
The New York Times
22.02.2001
iF Magazine
26.02.2001
Norman Transcript
28.02.2001
Boston Review
01.04.2001
Dazed & Confused, 2001
19.04.2001
Fashion Wire Daily
24.04.2001
Les Inrockuptibles n°287
01.05.2001
Elektra
01.05.2001
Scope
01.05.2001
Salon
01.06.2001
Nylon
01.06.2001
Index Magazine
01.07.2001
Q Magazine
01.08.2001
Plugged In
01.08.2001
Vibrations
01.08.2001
Wire
01.08.2001
Dazed & Confused, 2001
09.08.2001
The Independent
12.08.2001
Sunday magazine
16.08.2001
The Daily Telegraph (UK)
21.08.2001
Les Inrockuptibles n°161
24.08.2001
The Village Voice
25.08.2001
Jam ! (Canoe.ca)
26.08.2001
San Francisco Chronicle
27.08.2001
Magazine ELLE n°1648
27.08.2001
musicOMH
28.08.2001
PopMatters
30.08.2001
The Dallas Morning News
31.08.2001
Interview magazine
01.09.2001
Harper’s Bazaar
01.09.2001
Stylus
01.09.2001
Composite
01.09.2001
Jalouse
01.09.2001
Les Inrockuptibles n°300
01.09.2001
Juice
01.09.2001
TinyMixTapes
01.09.2001
Wire
02.09.2001
The Sunday Herald
03.09.2001
Tam tam etc.
04.09.2001
Detroit Free Press
05.09.2001
Portland Mercury
05.09.2001
Slate
10.09.2001
Newsweek
17.09.2001
The New Statesman
21.09.2001
Austin Chronicle
21.09.2001
Rock & Folk n°409
25.09.2001
Daily Telegraph (UK)
09.10.2001
Drawer B