musicOMH

Biophilia : ★★★★☆

There is a sense now that Björk may have done just about everything. All her solo albums have had a distinctive character, a particular intellectual quality and sense of musical purpose, from Vespertine’s almost paradoxical icy intimacy to the political and personal defiance of Volta. Perhaps the shock of the new has now diminished for Björk’s long-term admirers. Where else could she possibly go ?

Biophilia is a great deal more than just an album, however. It is a wide ranging multimedia project incorporating a series of apps (one for each song), a dedicated live show and an educational programme. Believe it or not, Björk has not quite succeeded in getting there first with this. The recent debut solo single from Gwilym Gold came in the form of a downloadable piece of software that ensured the song would never quite play in the same way twice.

Björk’s applications share a similar ambition to make music unpredictable and interactive. In one, listeners attempt to fuse two hemispheres together in order to create chords and another aims to communicate key information about musical scales. Other apps are more concerned with the album’s themes - Hollow features Björk’s face made from a series of DNA strands. Perhaps the most successful aspect of the apps concept is that each song on Biophilia is intended to emphasise a particular musical feature (counterpoint, arpeggios, tempo etc) and that the apps serve to explain this, and to further experiment with the ideas. Biophilia is most interesting in its careful fusion of musical and conceptual ideas.

The recent singles (Nattura and The Comet Song, neither duplicated on the album) have already provided an indication of Björk’s preoccupation with nature, the environment and science. Biophilia takes these notions to frequently ecstatic levels. Throughout, Björk attempts to marry her specific scientific and technological ideas with her musical ones. Crystalline, for example, explores complexity both in musical and physical structures. What could easily have ended up as a sterile academic exercise has, this being Björk, turned out to be an affecting and moving work. In spite of her use of electronic devices, Björk’s music always sounds so vivid, alive and wonderfully human, something emphasised by the recurring heartbeat pulse drum sound heard throughout Biophilia.

It should be stated clearly at the outset that Biophilia does not traverse any radically new musical territory for Björk. There is a sense of individuality in its thematic concerns and in its use of specially constructed instruments, but in essence it feels like a synthesis of Björk’s work thus far (albeit a brilliant one). It is an album that would be very easy to take for granted. For the most part, this is once again Björk at her most intimate, closer to Vespertine or Medulla than the slightly overcooked Volta. At times, particularly in its closing stages, it is actually more reminiscent of her soundtrack work, Drawing Restraint 9 especially. This makes the occasional abrasive interjections seem even more violent.

Moon reunites Björk with the unnervingly beautiful harp of Zeena Parkins and with the all-female Icelandic choir with which she toured Vespertine. With Björk and the choir accompanied with disarming minimalism, the focus is placed squarely on her unusual, brave melodies. So much of Biophilia is understated and elegant. The sublime Cosmogny feels like Björk at her most thoughtful, but also at her most brave. For the most part, she avoids resorting to her familiar vocal tropes in favour of a very stark, honest delivery.

Crystalline is Björk at her most familiar and approachable, at least until an imposing stew of off-kilter beats rudely disrupts the song’s flow. It’s an unexpected and disruptive gesture, but not perhaps a particularly novel one. Artists such as Aphex Twin or Kid 606 experimented with this sound many years ago. Indeed, it is arguable that more surprises have emerged from the inevitable glut of remixes that have accompanied Crystalline’s release as a single, not least the contribution from Omar Souleyman.

This is not to say that Biophilia is without its moments of total bravery. Dark Matter, little more than Björk’s vocals, the choir and the customised modern pipe organ, is extraordinary and more than a little unsettling, its melody traversing through a range of unusual and sometimes uncomfortable intervals. The closing Solstice is similarly at once pure and bracing.

There also remains something uniquely rapturous about Björk’s use of language, even including her occasional mangling of English. She seems entirely at liberty to say whatever she feels - there are no inhibitions or restrictions. English - a language so often associated with reserve or diplomacy, always sounds so enticing and odd when delivered in her syntax. On the wonderful Thunderbolt, she proclaims "my romantic gene is dominant and it hungers for union", another hint back to the candid, sensual reveries of Vespertine. Even the Virus somehow becomes a form of metaphor for sexual congress ("I knock on your skin and I am in") or desire ("Like a virus, patient hunter, I’m waiting for you, starving for you, my sweet adversary"). It is all gracefully matched by the song’s shifting, insidious tension.

With Biophilia, Björk has deftly avoided many of the dangers inherent in grand conceptual projects. The paraphernalia that surrounds Biophilia does not undermine or diminish the impact of the music, and the ideas, approaches and sounds are all successfully integrated. Whilst the musical content here is unlikely to shock or surprise Björk’s loyal admirers, it sees her continue to pursue her own radical and individual path with unshakeable conviction.

Daniel Paton

publié dans musicOMH - 06.10.2011

En lien avec...

 
 

Articles de la même année

 

2011

date
publication
titre
17.03.2011
Dazed Digital, 2011
28.05.2011
guardian.co.uk
27.06.2011
slantmagazine.com
29.06.2011
Stereogum
29.06.2011
pitchfork.com
01.07.2011
orange.co.uk
02.07.2011
liberation.fr
04.07.2011
Le Monde
04.07.2011
Dazed & Confused n°200
07.07.2011
Wired (UK)
11.07.2011
www.bjork.fr
13.07.2011
BBC Radio 6
22.07.2011
Billboard
27.07.2011
NME
29.07.2011
drownedinsound.com
04.09.2011
Madame Figaro
14.09.2011
L’Express
15.09.2011
L’Obs
19.09.2011
Télérama n°3218
20.09.2011
Les Inrockuptibles n°824
20.09.2011
Rock & Folk n°530
23.09.2011
M Magazine
26.09.2011
M Magazine
27.09.2011
M Magazine
27.09.2011
The boston Phoenix
28.09.2011
M Magazine
28.09.2011
Electronic Beats
29.09.2011
bbc.co.uk
29.09.2011
M Magazine
29.09.2011
M Magazine
30.09.2011
M Magazine
30.09.2011
Wire
30.09.2011
Tribune de Genève
01.10.2011
Marvin (MX)
01.10.2011
Vibrations
01.10.2011
Têtu
01.10.2011
Björk
01.10.2011
What HI-FI ? Sound & Vision
03.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
04.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
05.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
05.10.2011
Entertainment Weekly
05.10.2011
BBC Music
05.10.2011
MusicWeek
06.10.2011
cycling’74 .com
06.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
06.10.2011
Libération
06.10.2011
Libération
06.10.2011
The Guardian
06.10.2011
musicOMH
06.10.2011
Prefix Magazine
07.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
07.10.2011
Independent.co.uk
07.10.2011
The Reykjavik Grapevine
07.10.2011
Mirror.co.uk
07.10.2011
toutelaculture.com
07.10.2011
irishtimes.com
07.10.2011
Consequence of Sound
08.10.2011
The Globe and Mail
08.10.2011
NME
09.10.2011
New York Post
09.10.2011
Journal du Dimanche
10.10.2011
AllMusic
10.10.2011
guardian.co.uk
10.10.2011
Mowno
10.10.2011
Le Monde
10.10.2011
Libération
10.10.2011
Financial Times
10.10.2011
Pop Matters
10.10.2011
Wearsthetrousers.com
12.10.2011
Wall Street Journal
12.10.2011
Les Inrockuptibles n°828
13.10.2011
Paris Match
13.10.2011
Pitchfork
13.10.2011
Rock & Folk
17.10.2011
LA Times
18.10.2011
LA Times
23.10.2011
Icelandair Info
26.10.2011
Les Inrockuptibles n°830
28.10.2011
Wall Street Journal
01.11.2011
Mojo
01.11.2011
Gay & Night
17.11.2011
Dazed & Confused, 2011
22.11.2011
The Economist (blog)
24.11.2011
F5 - Magazine Russe