Pitchfork

Biophilia review 6.2/10

The most common caricatures of Björk tend to fixate on her outsized aesthetic sense. But for all the bonkers fashion choices, outré collaborators, and leftfield influences she pulls into her orbit, it’s easy to forget that her worldview is also equally informed by a sympathy and awareness of the systems that guide us. From the "beats and strings" manifesto that shaped Homogenic to the "music for laptop speakers" mandate that drove Vespertine through to the vocals-only absolutism of Medúlla, her obsession with patterns and structure and conceptual boundaries has consistently been at the center of her work. Often, she has celebrated the messiness and the chaos implicit in these very things ; in fact, the very first line of her very first single took a perverse delight in the lack of logic inherent in one of the biggest and most complex systems of all : human behavior.

Biophilia marks Björk’s eighth full-length release, and represents her definitive attempt to create an ecosystem around her work. Billed as her "most ambitious and interdisciplinary project yet" and boasting all the usual fixings of a Björk release (dazzling artwork, a Michel Gondry video, vanguard instrumentation, a bizarre list of collaborators), it also comes supported by a corresponding iPad application for each of its 10 tracks, a new website, a series of live shows and "music workshops", and a forthcoming 90-minute film documenting its creation. Beyond that, the album itself purports to engage with some pretty momentous themes, with song titles like "Thunderbolt", "Dark Matter", and "Cosmogony" and imagery focusing on time, space, and the natural world. (Note that editor Brandon Stosuy wrote press materials for this release prior to being hired by Pitchfork.)

The stakes feel even higher in light of Björk’s mottled output over the past decade. Between 2004’s well-received but thin-sounding Medúlla and 2007’s unfocused and sprawling Volta, Björk has arguably been unable to produce anything definitive since 2001’s Vespertine. In its worst moments, Volta painted a picture of an artist whose quality control instincts had been eroded by indulgence. One would be forgiven if news of all the scaffolding around Biophilia sounded up alarm bells : Is this her coming back strong, or piling conceptual materials on top of her music in an effort to give it extra depth ?

If the songs themselves are any indication, the answer leans more toward the latter. While the promotional and conceptual packaging around Biophilia are as forward-thinking as ever, the sheer quality of Björk’s songwriting remains problematic. It feels, once again, as if she’s prioritized the superficial aspects of Biophilia’s presentation over, well, the music. I can’t imagine, for example, how a middle section as dull as "Dark Matter" and "Hollow" made the cut. Even slightly more realized compositions like the the music box plink of "Virus" and the twitching "Thunderbolt" are essentially just simple motifs stretched way beyond their limits. Too often, she combats the lack of any real structure or melody by over-singing, or lapsing into one of her familiar and increasingly lazy-sounding house vocal runs. It too often feels as if Björk’s songwriting process is now to sing arbitrarily over top of her collaborators’ instrumental tracks rather than structure the music around a melody.

Sure, there are highlights. When she does get a tune to sing, she attacks it with almost apologetic gusto. Lead single "Crystalline" features one of the album’s best hooks, and as a result, one of Björk’s best and most focused performances. Elsewhere, the gorgeous "Cosmogony" carries a faint hymnal quality and an immediacy that wouldn’t sound totally out of place on Vespertine or even Homogenic. With its satisfyingly filthy electro skronk, the uptempo "Mutual Core" may be the album’s best track overall.

Although a big part of the PR story around Biophilia, the apps ultimately feel less than essential to the overall experience. Even after spending significant amounts of time with them, it’s easy to separate them mentally from the music. They’re well-designed and infused with appropriate amounts of playfulness and mystery, and a few have almost meditative properties that suit the music well, but ultimately they feel like they’re there to support a concept rather than vice versa. Beyond that, in costing $1.99 apiece (or just under $10 for the full complement), the app gambit ultimately hits upon another latter-day Björk tendency, which is her seeming willingness to exploit all available revenue streams.

Is it fair to fault Biophilia for failing to realize its own ambition ? That’s a tough question ; Björk’s curatorial acumen, her visual sense, and her vision are so beyond reproach that it feels almost churlish to complain about something as simple as a lack of melody, or the fact that she’s an experimental music pioneer who might just be over-charging for her experimental iPad apps. Nonetheless, for an album ostensibly about the elements, there are some essential pieces missing here. As an innovator, she’s as vibrant as ever, but as a songwriter, she sounds tired.

Mark Pytlik

publié dans Pitchfork - 13.10.2011

En lien avec...

 
 

Articles de la même année

 

2011

date
publication
titre
17.03.2011
Dazed Digital, 2011
28.05.2011
guardian.co.uk
27.06.2011
slantmagazine.com
29.06.2011
Stereogum
29.06.2011
pitchfork.com
01.07.2011
orange.co.uk
02.07.2011
liberation.fr
04.07.2011
Le Monde
04.07.2011
Dazed & Confused n°200
07.07.2011
Wired (UK)
11.07.2011
www.bjork.fr
13.07.2011
BBC Radio 6
22.07.2011
Billboard
27.07.2011
NME
29.07.2011
drownedinsound.com
04.09.2011
Madame Figaro
14.09.2011
L’Express
15.09.2011
L’Obs
19.09.2011
Télérama n°3218
20.09.2011
Les Inrockuptibles n°824
20.09.2011
Rock & Folk n°530
23.09.2011
M Magazine
26.09.2011
M Magazine
27.09.2011
M Magazine
27.09.2011
The boston Phoenix
28.09.2011
M Magazine
28.09.2011
Electronic Beats
29.09.2011
bbc.co.uk
29.09.2011
M Magazine
29.09.2011
M Magazine
30.09.2011
M Magazine
30.09.2011
Wire
30.09.2011
Tribune de Genève
01.10.2011
Marvin (MX)
01.10.2011
Vibrations
01.10.2011
Têtu
01.10.2011
Björk
01.10.2011
What HI-FI ? Sound & Vision
03.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
04.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
05.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
05.10.2011
Entertainment Weekly
05.10.2011
BBC Music
05.10.2011
MusicWeek
06.10.2011
cycling’74 .com
06.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
06.10.2011
Libération
06.10.2011
Libération
06.10.2011
The Guardian
06.10.2011
musicOMH
06.10.2011
Prefix Magazine
07.10.2011
drownedinsound.com
07.10.2011
Independent.co.uk
07.10.2011
The Reykjavik Grapevine
07.10.2011
Mirror.co.uk
07.10.2011
toutelaculture.com
07.10.2011
irishtimes.com
07.10.2011
Consequence of Sound
08.10.2011
The Globe and Mail
08.10.2011
NME
09.10.2011
New York Post
09.10.2011
Journal du Dimanche
10.10.2011
AllMusic
10.10.2011
guardian.co.uk
10.10.2011
Mowno
10.10.2011
Le Monde
10.10.2011
Libération
10.10.2011
Financial Times
10.10.2011
Pop Matters
10.10.2011
Wearsthetrousers.com
12.10.2011
Wall Street Journal
12.10.2011
Les Inrockuptibles n°828
13.10.2011
Paris Match
13.10.2011
Pitchfork
13.10.2011
Rock & Folk
17.10.2011
LA Times
18.10.2011
LA Times
23.10.2011
Icelandair Info
26.10.2011
Les Inrockuptibles n°830
28.10.2011
Wall Street Journal
01.11.2011
Mojo
01.11.2011
Gay & Night
17.11.2011
Dazed & Confused, 2011
22.11.2011
The Economist (blog)
24.11.2011
F5 - Magazine Russe